Dr. Worobey believes patient zero was a vendor named Wei Guixian, who had been working at the market and became ill on December 11.

A route with two options: Number one, a Wuhan bat sampler infected on a field sampling trip. Number two, a research accident in Wuhan when manipulating a Laos Banal-like bat coronavirus.

According to testimony in 2003, Fauci confirmed SARS was an emerging infectious disease of which data indicated it was tied to the coronavirus, the cause of 10-20 percent of common colds. There are two groups of corona viruses. This is likely a member of a new third group.

… softening that seemingly important conclusion by noting that modern bioengineering techniques are extremely difficult to detect.

One of the central players, who likely knows the details behind who exactly executed the release, is former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has been blaming the Chinese almost exclusively.

If you want to know a lot more about the no. 1 issue in the world today, read it.

These viruses have a fatality rate over 30 per cent, which is at least an order of magnitude more deadly than Sars-CoV-2.

“.. if the virus leaked from a Wuhan lab, the U.S. would shoulder some of the blame since it funded research at that lab through government grants from 2014 to 2019.”

“This is a roadmap to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic…”

Scientists exploring the origins of COVID-19 are warning that time may be running out. The truth is we may never know for sure where the pandemic came from [?]

“The work has helped in the development of mRNA coronavirus vaccines and the first approved COVID drug. ”
“We never provided the chimeric virus sequence, clones, or viruses to researchers at the WIV.”

Beijing sent experts to Guangzhou, capital of Guangdong province, to investigate on January 20, 2003 – but their report filed a week later was marked ‘Top secret’ and not shared with the WHO.

He funded the type of research that led to the outbreak of a monster virus.
That Fauci funded these arrogant people and the general type of cavalier research that possibly unleashed the pandemic suddenly transforms his halo into more sinister-looking headwear.

301 pages of emails and other records from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) officials in connection with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, revealing significant collaborations and funding that began in 2014.

China emulated US techniques to construct novel coronaviruses in unsafe conditions.

Most suspicious of all, the Chinese authorities have straightforwardly “refused to share direct records from the lab”. After the publication of the Science letter earlier this year, Dr. Shi told a reporter, “It’s definitely not acceptable” for other experts to review her lab’s records…

Throughout 2020, the notion that the novel coronavirus leaked from a lab was off-limits. Those who dared to push for transparency say toxic politics and hidden agendas kept us in the dark.
State Department investigators were warned against “digging in sensitive places” and repeatedly advised not to open a “Pandora’s box”.

‘At the end of that paper, the authors thank “Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein.”’
They also specify that the research was supported by the NIAID under the grant awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810, which together total $41.7 million.

Advanced plans were underway for the special presidential panel, with an executive order even drawn up to hold China and its collaborators accountable and tally a reparations bill to fire off to Beijing.
“The research the Chinese were doing on Gain of Function (GOF) was for potential military offensive purposes, they hid it and did not/have not shared what they knew and know.”