SARS-CoV-2 uses a three-pronged approach to keep cells from recruiting immune system to fend off the attack until it may be too late, says Weizmann Institute researcher.

Did people or nature open Pandora’s box at Wuhan?

The result of so-called “gain of function” experiments aim is to force the evolution of a virus by repeating infections in laboratory animals or cell cultures.

The 67-year old Xi Jinping has been transforming China for seven years and has radically reshaped the world in 2020. He is undoubtedly the greatest strategist on Earth today. Unless someone with character and intelligence emerges – and rather quickly, it is basically game over for liberty and the Western civilisation.

An updated summary of facts about the origin of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) – APRIL 2021

The National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) grant with the nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance, which involved the transfer of $600,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), described scientists conducting gain-of-function RESEARCH on SARS-like viruses to MAKE THEM EVEN MORE CONTAGIOUS.
Fauci needs to answer for why his agency bypassed oversight of funding to Wuhan Lab.

A lab escape was once dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Now, though, it is very much regarded as a plausible hypothesis. More worrying is the prospect that the virus might not just be an escaped sample of a naturally occurring bat coronavirus, but an engineered virus from gain-of-function research. This may explain why it was already well adapted to human-to-human transmission. The practice of building chimera coronaviruses, sometimes leaving no trace of manipulation, is not new.

Two U.S. individuals implicated in funding and researching bat coronaviruses with human infection potential are Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID, and Peter Daszak, Ph.D. Both have also publicly dismissed the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 originating in a lab and have worked to suppress such lines of inquiry. The WHO’s commission charged with the investigation of SARS-CoV-2’s origin has dismissed the lab-origin theory. In response, two dozen scientists and policy experts are calling for a truly independent investigation into the virus’ origin.

According to ‘credible’ information from a well-connected foreign government, the wife of one researcher died later that month.

The initial mortality rates in China were somewhere between “5-10%”

“A research group at the Wuhan City Virological Institute has been genetically manipulating coronaviruses for many years with the goal of making them more contagious, dangerous and deadly to humans…”

The WHO investigation is tainted from the outset because the WHO will not be looking into the possibility that the coronavirus originated in a lab.

As the virus spread around the world, the regime in Beijing began an aggressive campaign to spread disinformation claiming that the virus didn’t originate in China; that propaganda offensive continues today.

Fukuyama’s influential essay ‘The End of History’ announced the triumph of worldwide liberal democracy, but China did not read it.

Li-Meng Yan, A Chinese virologist (MD, PhD) who worked in a WHO reference lab and fled her position at the University of Hong Kong, has published a second co-authored report, alleging that SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, was not only created in a Wuhan lab, it’s an “unrestricted bioweapon” which was intentionally released.

Months after the pandemic began, the true origin of the coronavirus remains a mystery. Opinion.

We are witnessing the power and influence wielded by the CCP on major platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Obama administration’s funded Wuhan Institute of Virology, a P4-level bio-safety facility is now the subject of U.S. intelligence investigation.

The Chinese victims could be seen as collateral damage, not totally undesired considering the Chinese communist party has a strict policy to prevent population growth.

Oh, where is Dr. Freud when one needs him?