‘At the end of that paper, the authors thank “Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein.”’
They also specify that the research was supported by the NIAID under the grant awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810, which together total $41.7 million.
Advanced plans were underway for the special presidential panel, with an executive order even drawn up to hold China and its collaborators accountable and tally a reparations bill to fire off to Beijing.
“The research the Chinese were doing on Gain of Function (GOF) was for potential military offensive purposes, they hid it and did not/have not shared what they knew and know.”
The “PREDICT” program is the key to understanding the funding of EcoHealth Alliance and its work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Dr. Zheng-li Shi took the spike protein genes from various viruses and inserted them into the genomes of other viruses. The goal was to explore the natural ability of the various spike proteins to attack human cells. As with other gain-of-function studies, the idea was to explore the genetic pathways by which an animal virus might jump to humans, and thus help forestall an impending epidemic.
“… segments of the virus’s RNA had no relation to other coronaviruses such as SARS, and instead appeared to be closer to HIV.”
We now know now that the National Institutes of Health was not only aware of the report, but were actively discussing how to handle it.
After the pandemic began, Chinese scientists took samples of the COVID-19 virus and ‘retro-engineered’ it, making it appear as if it had evolved naturally.
SARS-CoV-2 uses a three-pronged approach to keep cells from recruiting immune system to fend off the attack until it may be too late, says Weizmann Institute researcher.
Did people or nature open Pandora’s box at Wuhan?
The result of so-called “gain of function” experiments aim is to force the evolution of a virus by repeating infections in laboratory animals or cell cultures.
The 67-year old Xi Jinping has been transforming China for seven years and has radically reshaped the world in 2020. He is undoubtedly the greatest strategist on Earth today. Unless someone with character and intelligence emerges – and rather quickly, it is basically game over for liberty and the Western civilisation.
An updated summary of facts about the origin of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) – APRIL 2021
The National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) grant with the nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance, which involved the transfer of $600,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), described scientists conducting gain-of-function RESEARCH on SARS-like viruses to MAKE THEM EVEN MORE CONTAGIOUS.
Fauci needs to answer for why his agency bypassed oversight of funding to Wuhan Lab.
A lab escape was once dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Now, though, it is very much regarded as a plausible hypothesis. More worrying is the prospect that the virus might not just be an escaped sample of a naturally occurring bat coronavirus, but an engineered virus from gain-of-function research. This may explain why it was already well adapted to human-to-human transmission. The practice of building chimera coronaviruses, sometimes leaving no trace of manipulation, is not new.
Two U.S. individuals implicated in funding and researching bat coronaviruses with human infection potential are Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID, and Peter Daszak, Ph.D. Both have also publicly dismissed the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 originating in a lab and have worked to suppress such lines of inquiry. The WHO’s commission charged with the investigation of SARS-CoV-2’s origin has dismissed the lab-origin theory. In response, two dozen scientists and policy experts are calling for a truly independent investigation into the virus’ origin.
According to ‘credible’ information from a well-connected foreign government, the wife of one researcher died later that month.
The initial mortality rates in China were somewhere between “5-10%”